The 1% Rule: Does It Still Apply in Canada?
- Greenell Properties Capital

- Sep 8
- 2 min read
The 1% rule has long been a quick rule of thumb for real estate investors: if a property rents for 1% of its purchase price per month, it’s likely to cash flow. But in Canada’s current market—especially in high-cost urban centres—is this metric still relevant?
In this blog, we explore what the 1% rule really means, where it still works, and which metrics you should be using instead.

1. A Quick Refresher: What Is the 1% Rule?
The idea is simple:If a property costs $500,000, it should generate at least $5,000/month in rent to meet the 1% rule.
The rule is popular because it helps investors quickly filter listings for cash flow potential—especially in affordable, high-rent areas.
2. Where It Doesn’t Work (Anymore)
In markets like Toronto, Vancouver, and increasingly Hamilton, even duplexes and triplexes rarely hit 1%. Most fall closer to 0.4%–0.7%.
Why?
Skyrocketing property prices
Rent control in key markets
Elevated interest rates reducing leverage efficiency
This doesn’t mean these areas are bad investments—but they tend to be appreciation-focused, not cash-flow-centric.

3. Where It Still Applies
Smaller cities and emerging rental markets still yield 1% or better, especially with value-add strategies or multi-unit properties.
Examples include:
Windsor, ON
Saint John, NB
Sudbury, ON
Regina, SK
North Bay, ON
These cities may lack population density—but offer better affordability and looser rent regulations.
4. What to Use Instead of the 1% Rule
A deeper analysis should always include:
Net Operating Income (NOI)
Cap rate (target 5%+ in many markets)
Cash-on-cash return
Loan coverage ratio (LCR)
Local rent comps and demand data
Investor Tip: Use the 1% rule as a first filter—but never rely on it alone for decision-making.

Final Thoughts
The 1% rule is becoming less relevant in many parts of Canada—but it still has value as a screening tool in cash-flow-focused markets.




Comments